3-object rule in succession of inheritance
Dear Sir or Madam,
Presentation of the situation:
In 2014, we (two brothers) inherited three undeveloped plots of land (A, B, C) from our father through succession. The plots had been in his ownership for over 30 years. Plots A and B are fully developed, ready-to-build plots of land. Plot C (the largest plot) is located behind the other two and was designated as "meadowland / fallow land". Through a development plan commissioned by us (the heirs), plot C was planned and legally developed, with access through plot B. There has been no construction activity such as road development or other construction work. Only the activities of the planning office were commissioned by us and led to a legally binding development plan. The plots have not been divided or surveyed yet. According to the development plan, we could now divide and survey the total area (A+B+C) into up to 10 building plots for single or double houses.
Question 1: If we now sell 8 out of the 10 parcels, will the "3-object rule" apply to us? After all, it is a legal inheritance without anticipation and my father was the owner for several decades before his death. Or does the activity surrounding the development plan automatically classify us as "commercial real estate dealers"?
Question 2: If we now divide the inheritance and dissolve the heirs' community, and then each brother parcels and sells their share (5 plots per brother), will we also fall under the "3-object rule" and have to pay taxes on all sales? Is it not technically true that the heirs' community commissioned the development plan and not the individual brother?
Question 3: If questions 1 and 2 lead to the conclusion that the "3-object rule" applies and sales tax is due if each person sells more than 3 plots within 5 years, what else can be done to avoid this within the framework of the law? One possibility would be to combine 3 parcels and sell them to an investor who can then divide them themselves afterwards. Are there any other options available?