Frag-Einen

Ask a lawyer on the topic of Tenancy law

online booking

Hello, here is a brief summary of the background: I had rented out a property and rightfully retained the tenant's deposit, after proper behavior, notification of set-off, compliance with deadlines, etc. The tenants had caused many damages, even exceeding the deposit amount, and did not return the house for over 2 months after the end of the lease, but simply threw the keys into the mailbox at some point, resulting in loss of rent against set-off, allowing me to offset the deposit alone. Now the tenants have demanded their deposit back and are pursuing legal action. I did not hire a lawyer as I am currently in a difficult financial situation.

Now to the only question:
The tenants/plaintiffs claim completely unfounded and unsubstantiated that there was alleged text message communication between a friend of mine who was supposed to conduct the house inspection/handover with the tenants on my behalf. They allege that my friend constantly rescheduled appointments, causing the tenants, the plaintiffs, to not be able to return the house on time and only do so 2 months later. I made a written request for evidence, as the plaintiffs' argument is completely unsubstantiated, and asked the court to require the plaintiffs to provide the phone numbers of the parties involved. Also, to present the call records and the plaintiffs' phone for inspection. Each text message has a call record, which they did not provide, but merely claim that there was a text message correspondence. Now it seems that the court is solely focusing on this text message correspondence, and I can prove that the plaintiffs are lying, but the court is completely ignoring my request for evidence. Now they have invited my friend as a witness for the plaintiffs. The fact is that this communication could not have taken place because the tenants had only one phone number for my friend. However, this phone contract no longer existed at the time of the alleged correspondence, as confirmed in writing by the network provider. Phone calls and text messages were therefore impossible. It is essential for the plaintiffs to substantiate which phone number they claim to have used for this correspondence, as their lies will then fall apart. I have repeatedly requested the court to address the lack of substantiated evidence. It is also inexplicable to me how a court can summon witnesses based on unsubstantiated claims. I cannot write to the court that the number no longer existed, as the plaintiffs may then research my friend's new number and use that. What can I do to finally get the court to require the plaintiffs to provide the phone numbers between which this alleged text message correspondence supposedly took place?????????????????? They cannot present call records or phone call logs. That is my question. I have the impression that the judge knows the opposing party's lawyer very well, to put it politely. Thank you.

Andreas Scholz

Dear inquirer,

first of all, as you say: Each party must prove the facts favorable to them in civil proceedings. This follows the schema you correctly identified:

Claim by the opposing party, then denial on your part.

Now, since the opposing party's claim that the delayed return was your responsibility due to a mistake by your acquaintance has been denied by you, the opposing party must prove this claim. Since an SMS exchange cannot be presented as evidence, the opposing party has apparently offered the testimony of your acquaintance as evidence. The court seems to have accepted this offer in order to determine whether the fault for the delayed return actually lay with them, or if there was even an SMS exchange regarding this matter. Only the testimony of your acquaintance can shed light on this. Since you have received the documents from the opposing party from the court, you can verify that the testimony of your acquaintance has been offered as evidence.

Therefore, the court's behavior is not objectionable. It follows the procedural rules of evidence in civil proceedings.

I hope this helps. If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.

Sincerely,

Andreas Scholz, Esq.

fadeout
... Are you also interested in this question?
You can view the complete answer for only 7,50 EUR.

Bewertung dieser Frage

Wie hilfreich war die Antwort des Experten?
"Die Antwort war wohl recht gut Ich bin nicht unzufrieden mit meinem Leben, wohl aber mit der Unkenntnis meines Zustandes, es ärgert mich nicht zu wissen ob man " krank " ist oder nicbt, dass belastet mich"
Wie bewerten Sie die Reaktionszeit des Experten?
"Gut"
Wie empfehlenswert ist der Experte?
"Kann nichts schlechtes sagen, allerdings neigen Ärze offenbar immer dem Mainstream nachzueifern ( aus welchen Gründrn auch immer) Im übrigen scheinen sie sich was Antwort 1 und 6 angeht sich zu widersprechen Vielleicht gehen sie in einer Nachantwort noch kurz darauf ein OB SIE denken ob man an der Sexualität was ändern kann Leider haben sie zudem meine Frage bzgl der Änderbarkeit epigenischer Faktoren nicht beantworte Es geht mir darum zu erscheinen, ob diese Epigenischen Dinge leichter rüvkgängig zu machen sind, als die Gene, DNA an sich Das ist übrigens meine Kernfrage gewesen Sollte ich nichts gegenteiliges hören, gehe ich davon aus, dass das nur schwer änderbar ist "

Experte für Tenancy law

Andreas Scholz