No fixed takeover - TVAöD circumvented?
I am concerned about a takeover. I am in my 2nd year of apprenticeship, learning the profession of gardener (specializing in ornamental plant cultivation) in the public sector (municipal employer in Hesse).
In an initial "exploratory discussion" regarding this issue, it has been determined that a 12-month takeover is planned for me, as agreed in the collective bargaining agreement. However, and this brings me to my question, they do not intend to offer me a permanent contract afterwards if I do not have a driver's license for small trucks (Class C1). The employer sees the initially temporary takeover as a kind of "charity" to give me the opportunity to obtain the driver's license.
As far as I understand, the collective agreement for public service employees stipulates that after the temporary contract, the employer is obligated to offer a permanent contract unless I have committed serious misconduct and there is a business need (which, in my opinion, has already been demonstrated with my initial temporary takeover).
A large part of the workforce does not have a truck driver's license and there are no issues because not everyone drives a vehicle, as vehicles are shared among a group of four or five. In light of this, I believe it is not justified to argue that there is a lack of business need if one does not have a truck driver's license and therefore would not be "usable" for the operation.
I believe this reasoning is being used to avoid too many long-term takeovers. This is my subjective perception.
Is this approach legally compliant with the collective agreement, or is it a violation of the agreement applicable to me? If I am initially taken over on a temporary basis without a truck driver's license, do I have the right to receive a permanent contract even without a truck driver's license?