Differences in treatment with differing medical histories for thrombosis.
I want to find out what treatment differences arise specifically when the same framework parameters but differences in details in the medical history are present.
Framework facts:
Patient, early 60s, hypertension, obesity, smoker, knee surgery 20 days ago.
Suspicion of acute cholecystitis with the need for emergency cholecystectomy.
Medical history variant at admission 1:
"A thrombosis has not occurred in the patient so far, but in the family."
Medical history variant at admission 2:
"A thrombosis has occurred in both first-degree relatives and in the patient herself in the past."
What important differences arise preoperatively, operatively and postoperatively in the above-mentioned variants of the medical history while adhering to medical standards and the duty of medical care?