Frag-Einen

Ask a lawyer on the topic of Family law

Entitlement to the transfer of the vehicle no-claims bonus according to § 1353 of the German Civil Code (BGB)

I have been married for 11 years - employed in the public sector, my wife is employed in the industry. On 24.11.1997, my wife's previous vehicle (which was insured back then through her mother with another company SF 6 60% - because she only got her driver's license in March 1989) was replaced by a new car, which is now insured through me due to more favorable conditions from my profession (public sector & home tariff). In the past years, I already had another contract which had accumulated SF 9 - 45% no claims bonus years before I met my wife. A discount transfer TB28 from my wife's parents' contract did not take place. The marriage has lasted for 11 years. At the end of 2008, my wife moves out of our shared household. She takes the second vehicle currently running on this contract with her and registers it in her name on 01.01.2009. Now she demands all the discounts on this contract (SF 20 in liability insurance, SF 16 in comprehensive insurance), including the no claims years before marriage and before she could have earned the discounts herself. These discounts were acquired 100% by me with previous vehicles.

Furthermore, it should be noted that the second vehicle was only used by the wife for "shopping" and "taking children to school" within the town. The wife did not undertake any other trips alone. In the case of holiday trips, excursions, etc. that were exclusively done with me in the last few years - as my wife lost interest in the family and instead found new "friends" on contact forums online - I drove the vehicle (traditional role distribution; when both are in the car, the man drives). Thus, the majority of the usage - mileage is around 80%-90% by me. My wife never exclusively used our family vehicle. It was usually "large family vans" for a family with 3 children (Toyota Avensis, VW Sharan) with which the family was mobile. During this time, I professionally drove a 2-seater van (VW Caddy). This also shows that the family vehicle - the contract on which the second vehicle was running was not exclusively driven by my wife for a long time. Therefore, it was not just formal reasons that spoke for the insurance through the husband, but also his more favorable insurance option through the public sector and the predominant usage (mileage) by him.

My wife claims that there is a BGH ruling that allows her to transfer the discount. Is that correct? Do I have to transfer no claims bonuses - and if so, how many?

THANK YOU!

Dr. Dr. Danjel-Philippe Newerla

Dear Seeker of Advice,

Thank you for your inquiry!

I would like to address your question taking into account the facts you provided and your dedication to it as follows:

I am not aware of a ruling by the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) that specifically applies to your case.

However, the issue you raised has been addressed in case law for some time now, and in certain circumstances, a transfer of the no-claims bonus has been decided in favor (see for example the judgment of the District Court Flensburg dated 07.06.2006 (Case No.: 1 T 30/06) District Court Freiburg dated 15.08.2006 (Case No.: 5 O 64/06).

Such a claim for transfer arises from the spousal duty of fidelity according to § 1353 of the German Civil Code. Ultimately, it is a requirement for the transfer that the second car has been used exclusively and for an extended period by the other spouse, in this case your wife, and that an insurance policy was taken out in the name of the other spouse only for formal reasons or to take advantage of cost savings.

However, based on your description, it appears that neither of the vehicles was exclusively used by your wife, but rather by you, so according to current case law, a transfer of the no-claims bonus cannot be carried out.

I hope this provides you with some initial legal guidance and wish you much success and all the best!

I would like to point out the following as a final note:

The legal advice I provided is based solely on the information you provided. My response is only a preliminary legal assessment of the situation and cannot replace a comprehensive evaluation of the facts. Adding or omitting relevant information could lead to a completely different legal assessment.

I hope my explanations have been helpful. Feel free to contact me via my email address or the follow-up option.

Wishing you a pleasant Thursday afternoon!

Best regards,

Dipl.-Jur. Danjel-Philippe Newerla, Attorney at Law

Heilsbergerstr. 16
27580 Bremerhaven
kanzlei.newerla@web.de
Tel. 0471/3088132
Fax: 0471/3088316

fadeout
... Are you also interested in this question?
You can view the complete answer for only 7,50 EUR.

Experte für Family law

Dr. Dr. Danjel-Philippe Newerla

Dr. Dr. Danjel-Philippe Newerla

Bremerhaven

Amtsgerichtsbezirk: Bremerhaven

Berufshaftpflichtversicherung:

R+V Versicherung AG
Taunusstr.1
65193 Wiesbaden



Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Newerla beschäftigt sich schwerpunktmäßig mit dem Familien-, dem Erb-, dem Wettbewerbs-, Internet- und Computerrecht sowie dem allgemeinen Zivilrecht.

Neben der klassischen
Rechtsberatung und der außergerichtlichen sowie gerichtlichen Vertretung hat sich die Kanzlei auf die Erstellung sowie Überprüfung von Verträgen jeglicher Art, sowie Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen und Onlineauftritten sowie die Abwehr wettbewerbsrechtlicher, sowie marken- und urheberrechtlicher Abmahnungen spezialisiert.

Expert knowledge:
  • Media law
  • Internet and computer law
Complete profile