Execution, escrow funds
The question refers to a possible enforcement for security purposes.
A sum X was transferred from an acquaintance to an account of Secure Life AG for the purchase of gold. This amount is proven to be in the account.
Now, a seizure has been ordered against the directors and the accounts have been "frozen". The Federal Gazette states:
What can the victim, who has transferred money here but has not received any gold, do now?
"Public Prosecutor's Office Oldenburg
950 Js 3945/11 (1100 Js 100017/11)
In the investigation proceedings of the Public Prosecutor's Office Oldenburg, Gerichtsstraße 7, 26135 Oldenburg, against Josef Gerein, Andreas Tissen and others for fraud to the detriment of investors of the companies Secure Life Investments AG, Golden Gate Investments AG in formation and Golden Gate Trust AG, on the basis of the resolutions of the Local Court Oldenburg of 23.02.2011 (No.: 28 Gs 11 Js 100017/11 (634/11)), enforceable seizures have been ordered and secured by way of confiscation and seizure for the purpose of recovery assistance for injured assets against the suspects Gerein and Tissen as well as the following companies, among others, to prevent asset transfers.
Secure Life Investments AG HRB 203577 Local Court Osnabrück with headquarters in 49074 Osnabrück, Schloßstr. 28 - 30
Board: Josef Gerein (seizure amount: €505,657.35 - secured assets: approx. €108,396.09)
Golden Gate Trust AG HRB 65078 Local Court Düsseldorf with its headquarters in 40545 Düsseldorf, Kaiser - Friedrich - Ring 43
Board: Andreas Tissen (seizure amount: €280,403.81 - secured assets: €216,669.74)
Golden Gate Investments AG in formation
(seizure amount: €302,557.02 - secured assets: none)
Josef Gerein, residing at Schloßstr. 30, 49074 Osnabrück
(seizure amount: €759,549.72 - secured assets: approx. €137,964.86)
Andreas Tissen, residing at Heinrich - Walbröhl - Weg 18, 40489 Düsseldorf
(seizure amount: €302,557.02 - secured assets: approx. €15,467.31)
The prosecutorial security measures and their publication according to § 111e (4) StPO are intended to enable victims of the crime to secure their claims in the secured assets through their own civil enforcement measures. An informal registration of the claim with the Public Prosecutor's Office has no legal effect and is therefore not sufficient. The maintenance of these provisional security measures for the victims of the crime is limited in time. As it is not foreseeable how
