Frag-Einen

Ask a lawyer on the topic of Contract law

BahnCard 25 in subscription

I had a Bahncard 25 subscription, valid until September 2009.

Since the price increased by a few euros this year, I immediately cancelled my subscription and returned the new card - valid until September 2010 - upon receiving it. I cited the reason for cancellation as not being informed about the price increase for the new card by the railway company.

The railway accepted the cancellation, but only effective from the expiration of the new Bahncard in September 2010, as the cancellation was not submitted 6 weeks before the expiration of the old Bahncard. I am now required to pay for another full year.

I wrote back again, explaining that I never received any information about the price increase, and returned the card once more. I can prove that the railway did not send any information, as all incoming mail is registered in our company. Therefore, it is verifiable that no such information from the railway was received.

In response to these allegations, the railway now states the following:

Information about the upcoming price increase was publicly communicated over a month in advance, including in press, radio, and other media outlets.

The railway has also announced that they will resend the returned Bahncard and, if necessary, pursue the payment for the entire year through legal means.

Is all of this legal?? Am I required to pay for the Bahncard for a year, even though I was not informed about the price increase?? Does it count as being informed if the press reports that the card will become more expensive?? Can I now refuse to accept the new Bahncard and return it again??

If possible, I would like to challenge the railway on this matter, if there is a chance to do so.

Dr. Dr. Danjel-Philippe Newerla

Dear Inquirer,

Thank you for your inquiry!

According to the terms and conditions of the German Railways for the Bahncard, you have the right to terminate the contract after a price increase, namely 4 weeks from the receipt of the price increase or from the knowledge thereof.

Therefore, the statement by the railway that you are only out of the contract in autumn 2010 is not correct.

You should clarify this with the railway again and not pay any further contributions from the fourth week after knowledge of the price increase and your termination.

I hope I have answered your inquiry to your satisfaction.

If there are still any uncertainties, please do not hesitate to ask.
Otherwise, I wish you a restful weekend.

Sincerely,

Dipl.-Jur.Danjel-Philippe Newerla, Attorney at Law

fadeout
... Are you also interested in this question?
You can view the complete answer for only 7,50 EUR.

Bewertung dieser Frage

Wie hilfreich war die Antwort des Experten?
"Ja"
Wie bewerten Sie die Reaktionszeit des Experten?
"sehr schnell"
Wie empfehlenswert ist der Experte?
"sehr kompetent"

Experte für Contract law

Dr. Dr. Danjel-Philippe Newerla

Dr. Dr. Danjel-Philippe Newerla

Bremerhaven

Amtsgerichtsbezirk: Bremerhaven

Berufshaftpflichtversicherung:

R+V Versicherung AG
Taunusstr.1
65193 Wiesbaden



Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Newerla beschäftigt sich schwerpunktmäßig mit dem Familien-, dem Erb-, dem Wettbewerbs-, Internet- und Computerrecht sowie dem allgemeinen Zivilrecht.

Neben der klassischen
Rechtsberatung und der außergerichtlichen sowie gerichtlichen Vertretung hat sich die Kanzlei auf die Erstellung sowie Überprüfung von Verträgen jeglicher Art, sowie Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen und Onlineauftritten sowie die Abwehr wettbewerbsrechtlicher, sowie marken- und urheberrechtlicher Abmahnungen spezialisiert.

Expert knowledge:
  • Media law
  • Internet and computer law
Complete profile